The escalation of tensions around Iran has once again raised the question of Spain’s role in international conflicts. Comments made by former Prime Minister Aznar in Valencia sparked wide debate among politicians and experts. His stance emphasizes that Spain must not only maintain its alliances, but also make decisions that will shape the country’s future on the world stage.
As El Pais notes, Aznar insists that if a military operation is launched, it must be seen through to the end. He believes that unfinished actions lead to recurring crises and threats for Europe. In his view, supporting allies is not simply a formality, but a strategic necessity for the security of Spain and the entire region.
Aznar’s arguments
In his speech at the Forinvest forum, Aznar highlighted his assessment that the regime in Iran violates international norms and poses a threat to the stability of the Middle East. He argues that attempts to reshape the region’s political landscape are inevitable as long as the threat of terrorism and nuclear proliferation remains. However, Aznar declined to discuss whether the actions of allies fully comply with international law, which raised questions from part of the audience.
The former prime minister emphasized the importance of mutual support among countries that are part of alliances. He noted that Spain had received help from the United States during difficult times and now should be ready to reciprocate. According to Aznar, allied commitments are not just words, but concrete actions that build trust among nations.
Government criticism
Aznar also addressed domestic politics. He criticized the current government of Pedro Sánchez, describing it as ineffective and an unreliable partner for international allies. In his view, Spain as a state remains a steadfast ally, regardless of cabinet changes. He urged people to distinguish between government actions and the country’s interests as a whole, stressing that long-term relations with the US and Europe are more important than short-term political decisions.
During his speech, Aznar also stated that he does not support populist approaches, whether from the right or the left. He distanced himself from Donald Trump’s policies as well as from those of Sánchez and Abascal, affirming his commitment to liberal-conservative values. His remarks were laced with jokes and references to his own book, which added a more informal tone to the discussion of serious issues.
Historical context
Aznar recalled the importance of Spain’s historic ties with the US, highlighting that only two Spaniards have addressed the US Congress — King Juan Carlos and himself. He believes the country should leverage its experience and influence to strengthen its position on the international stage. Concluding his speech, Aznar called on citizens not to remain indifferent and to take an active part in political life, especially with new elections approaching.
Representatives of various political groups, including members of the Valencia government, attended the event. In the evening, Aznar planned to participate in a book presentation dedicated to the events of 11-M, which also attracted interest among politicians and the public.
Implications for Spain
Debate over the military operation in Iran and Spain’s stance continues amid rising tensions in the region. According to RUSSPAIN.COM, decisions made now could affect the country’s economic and political stability in the coming years. It is worth noting that Spain’s response to the Iran crisis has previously been raised, and an analysis of the sanctions and economic impact shows that the country is seeking a balance between supporting its allies and protecting its own interests.
In recent years, Spain has repeatedly faced a dilemma: whether to follow the lead of major partners or to pursue an independent policy. Similar debates arose during the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as when discussing sanctions against other states. Each time, the decision was accompanied by lively debates in society and parliament. Now, the situation surrounding Iran once again poses complex questions for the country, requiring a balanced approach and careful consideration of long-term consequences for national security and the economy.
