
A dramatic story unfolded in the port of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, leaving neither residents nor visitors indifferent. Early in the morning, police and Civil Guard officers arrived at the dock of the city’s marina. Their target was Margarita, a 71-year-old woman who had spent years living on her small sailboat. For her, this old, weather-beaten vessel was not just a means of transportation—it was her only home.
Port authorities stated that the vessel did not meet safety or hygiene regulations. According to them, the boat had long lost its seaworthiness, and its condition posed a risk not only to its owner but also to others nearby. The decision to evict her was made quickly, leaving the woman no time to find an alternative. Despite her age and vulnerability, Margarita was left with no choice: her home had to be removed from the dock immediately.
Public Reaction
The situation sparked a wave of strong emotions among locals and activists. Many believe that such cases require greater compassion and consideration for people’s circumstances. Margarita didn’t hide her despair: she had no other housing options, and, according to her, support from social services was minimal. City officials promised to temporarily accommodate her in one of the local shelters, but for Margarita, this decision came as a heavy blow.
On social media and in the streets, people are debating whether port officials acted fairly. Some insist that safety comes first; others believe it is wrong to leave an elderly person without a roof over their head. The question of where the line lies between the letter of the law and human compassion has once again sparked heated debate.
Authorities’ arguments
Port authorities insist their actions were guided solely by concerns for safety. They argue that, had the vessel remained on the water, it could have led to an accident or even a tragedy. Officials claim they warned Margarita multiple times to bring the boat up to standard, but nothing changed. Ultimately, when their patience ran out, they decided to proceed with forced eviction.
However, many people are asking whether there really was no other solution. Could a compromise have been reached, more time given for repairs or to find alternative housing? For now, there are no answers. All that remains is to follow how the situation unfolds and hope the municipal services fulfill their promises to support the woman.
A personal dimension
Margarita’s story is more than just another eviction case. It’s a reminder of how quickly someone can end up on the street, even after a long life with a place to call their own. For her, the sailboat was everything: home, memories, a symbol of freedom. Now, she is forced to leave behind all she valued and start over in a shelter.
Stories like this always raise questions about the system and evoke empathy. Why, in the 21st century, do elderly people still find themselves so vulnerable? Who should be accountable for their wellbeing? What matters more—formal rules or human dignity? Residents of Las Palmas, and all of Spain, are searching for answers.












