A new stage of a high-profile investigation is unfolding in Madrid, involving the wife of the current head of government. Judge Juan Carlos Peinado yesterday signed a document stating that if the case over the alleged misappropriation of funds proceeds to trial, it will be heard by a jury panel. This step is provided for by Spanish law, but is rarely used in practice, especially in cases involving the highest levels of government.
The court’s decision has already sparked a noticeable reaction among politicians. The opposition seized the opportunity to increase pressure on the government, stating that such proceedings should lead to serious consequences for the cabinet. Meanwhile, government representatives insist the accusations are unsupported by evidence and that the investigation itself is baseless.
In March 2025, Judge Peinado launched a separate line of inquiry within the case, focusing on the possible misuse of funds linked to the activities of Begoña Gómez’s assistant at Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Most of the material concerns other potential violations, including corruption and abuse of influence. As evidence, emails provided by the former vice-rector of the university are being cited. The defense categorically rejects these arguments and is preparing an appeal.
The investigation is not yet formally concluded, and the question of whether the case will go to trial remains open. In the near future, the judge intends to hear the positions of all parties, including the prosecution and defense attorneys. The Madrid provincial court is also expected to review other complaints related to this case. Although jury trials for charges of embezzlement are rare, there have been similar cases in Spain’s history, especially when they involved high-profile political scandals. By law, the jury will consist of nine citizens, and the proceedings will be presided over by a professional judge. Peinado’s decision is not final and may be appealed within the designated time frame.
