The National Court of Spain has issued a ruling that could set a precedent for the entire country’s award system. The Ministry of the Interior is now required to award a Civil Guard sergeant the highest honor for his heroic actions during a devastating flood that claimed hundreds of lives in Valencia and other regions.
The sergeant, who took part in rescue operations, drew public attention after his act of bravery was rated lower than his immediate superiors had recommended. Despite risking his own life to save a person trapped in raging floodwaters, the ministry only presented him with a less prestigious medal, which does not include a financial reward.
The court case revealed that the ministry’s decision lacked sufficient justification. The judge stated that the ministry’s arguments about the rescuer allegedly being completely safe do not hold up to scrutiny. According to the court, even with personal protective equipment and all safety measures in place, the risk to life in such situations remains extremely high.
Why the court’s ruling matters for the entire honors system
During the proceedings, it was revealed that the ministry ignored the opinions of the specialists who directly led the operation. Their expert assessment was based on real circumstances and professional experience, not on formal criteria. The court emphasized that such conclusions cannot be disregarded without valid reasons.
Now the ministry must reconsider its decision and award the sergeant the well-deserved Cross of Merit with Red Ribbon, which not only symbolizes recognition but also entitles the recipient to additional financial benefits. This ruling could impact future awards for law enforcement personnel, especially in situations involving life-threatening risks.
Consequences for the Ministry of Interior and the lifesaving heroes
The court’s decision highlights the need for transparency and justification in awarding honors. Agencies will no longer be able to rely on vague formulations if they ignore professional recommendations. For many members of the Guardia Civil and other services, this is a signal: their heroic acts will not go unnoticed, and justice can be restored even after time has passed.
Although the court’s decision may still be appealed, it has already sparked wide debate among law enforcement officials and the public. The question of how the state evaluates and rewards heroism has once again become the focus of public discussion.
