In recent months, the name David Uclés has been on everyone’s lips among literature enthusiasts and discussed in a wide range of circles. His novel “La península de las casas vacías” became a true sensation, selling over 300,000 copies and sparking a wave of interest in the author. In 2026, Uclés won the prestigious Nadal Prize for his new book “La ciudad de las luces muertas,” further fueling public attention to him. However, with recognition came fierce debates and a wave of negativity that forced the writer to leave social media.
In his farewell message, Uclés did not hide his disappointment: he stated that the platform X (formerly Twitter) had become for him a source of daily insults, threats, and attacks—aimed not only at his work, but also at him personally. According to the author, he was criticized for his appearance, sexuality, and even the way he wore his famous cap. “I have always been a happy child and want to remain one,” he wrote, saying goodbye to his followers.
An outside perspective
Amid this uproar, other prominent figures in Spanish literature also joined the debate. Particular attention was drawn to the reaction of Arturo Pérez-Reverte, author of the iconic Captain Alatriste series. On Canal Sur Radio, where he appeared as part of the ‘Letras en Sevilla’ literary days, Pérez-Reverte did not shy away from sensitive topics and spoke with complete candor about the Uclés phenomenon.
According to him, the novel ‘La península de las casas vacías’ is not just another book, but a fresh, youthful perspective on literature that blends elements of magical realism with deep personal experience. Pérez-Reverte emphasized that the work does not fit into the framework of a historical novel, but stands as an independent literary phenomenon. ‘This is truly literature, not just genre fiction,’ he noted.
Image and perception
A special place in Pérez-Reverte’s commentary was given to the image of Ucles himself. The writer noted how the young author skillfully plays with external stereotypes: ‘He comes across as a simple guy from the provinces, always in a cap, but behind that lies sharp observation and an extraordinary mind.’ In Pérez-Reverte’s view, Ucles is a person who knows how to surprise and is not afraid to be himself, despite pressure and criticism.
At the same time, it was precisely this sincerity and openness that made him a target for attacks. In Spanish society, where public figures are often forced to hide behind masks, Ucles chose the path of honesty—and paid the price. His departure from social media became a kind of protest against the toxicity and aggression that increasingly accompany success in the public sphere.
A literary phenomenon
Ucles’s success is no accident. His books resonate with a wide range of readers, and discussion about his persona extends far beyond literary circles. In an era when writers rarely become true newsmakers, Ucles has managed not only to draw attention to his works, but also to stir intense emotions in society. His story is more than just a path to fame—it reflects the complex processes shaping contemporary culture.
Pérez-Reverte, despite his directness, does not hide his affection for the young colleague. He repeatedly emphasizes, “Very smart guy. I like him.” These words express not only recognition of talent but also respect for someone unafraid to be himself and speak openly about his feelings.
The Price of Success
The story of David Ucles is not just about the rise of a young writer, but also a warning about the challenges faced by those who go beyond the conventional. His example shows that even in the literary world, success can turn into a test of endurance. Perhaps it is precisely such stories that make us reflect on the real price of popularity and what lies behind the image the public sees.
