During a live broadcast from Madrid’s Puerta del Sol on the evening of 15 October 2026, a man interrupted reporter Unai Cano and shoved him towards a fountain. Cano was covering a housing-rights camp after footage circulated of people bathing in a fountain near the monument to Charles III. From the studio, Iker Jiménez urged Cano to get to safety and seek police help.
The incident at Sol
Cano had reported from the camp on previous days. During the latest broadcast, he was describing what was happening near one of the square’s fountains when a man approached, blocked his work and heckled him. The shove sent Cano towards the water. Footage published by Cuatro showed him keeping his balance at the edge of the fountain. He tried to move away and continue the live report, but the situation worsened.
From the studio, Jiménez urged Cano to move away from the man and get to safety. He also told him to alert nearby officers. Cano later said the man had been threatening and insulting the team for some time. He said people came out of the tents and made the crew leave. Some pushed them; others asked them to go without pushing. Cano’s account focused on one man and did not blame the camp as a whole.
Cano described the rest of the camp as relatively calm.
Cuatro reported that the crew filed a complaint and Cano gave police a recording of the live broadcast. He said he understood that the man had been identified. The team stopped filming at that location after the confrontation.
Political controversy around Horizonte
The confrontation came amid weeks of disputes involving Horizonte, but the account does not link those controversies to the man’s conduct. In the same broadcast, Jiménez addressed comments by Eduardo Inda about pensions and the Partido Popular. A video of the exchange later circulated on social media. Pedro Sánchez and Óscar Puente shared fragments of it.
Jiménez also recalled the earlier dispute over Maricarmen, a woman facing eviction. He said two colleagues, Carmen Porter and Beatriz Talegón, had faced risks after that controversy. Those claims came from Jiménez’s account on the programme.
Horizonte’s editorial choices remain open to criticism. The programme has been part of political disputes, and criticism of its coverage does not require approval of its presenters. Interfering with a reporter working in public is a separate matter. Political figures and television presenters can amplify a dispute, but the account of this incident does not show that any shared video caused the shove.
