Former Spanish Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos and his former adviser Koldo García have decided to challenge the accusations brought against them by the Supreme Court. Both figures in the high-profile mask procurement case, launched at the height of the pandemic, have filed appeals, insisting on the lack of sufficient evidence and violations of their right to defense.
The defense’s main argument is that the investigation was carried out with clear bias. Lawyers claim their clients were denied access to seized digital materials, and that requests for additional investigative actions were ignored. They also point out that the investigation began before official parliamentary authorization was obtained, which they argue violates the immunity of Members of Parliament.
The case materials include accusations of bribery, involvement in a criminal group, influence peddling, and embezzlement of public funds. Investigators believe that Ábalos may have facilitated lucrative mask supply contracts for certain companies, receiving financial benefits in return—either in cash or through rent payments. However, the defense insists that all financial transactions were transparent and that any expenses by the adviser were subsequently reimbursed.
Lawyers are paying particular attention to episodes involving the interception of documents, which they believe indicate violations of immunity and procedural standards. They also note that not everyone who may have been involved in the alleged irregularities has been included in the investigation. For example, the former partner of Ábalos, who allegedly had her rent paid, is not among the suspects.
The appeals emphasize that the investigation’s conclusions are based on assumptions and the testimony of certain individuals, rather than objective evidence. The defense argues that any financial ties between those involved do not indicate a crime, but are explained by everyday circumstances. In addition, the lawyers point out possible informal agreements between the prosecution and one of the key figures, which, in their view, could undermine the objectivity of the process.
The court case over the purchase of masks has become one of the most talked-about in Spain in recent years. The focus has been not only on corruption issues, but also on the rights of the accused and the transparency of the investigation. Now, the Supreme Court must consider the appeals and decide the future of the case.
