The scandal surrounding tax allegations against Alberto González Amador has become one of the most discussed topics in Spain. The spotlight now is not only on the alleged violations, but also on issues of judicial transparency and the impact of public statements on the case. For Spaniards, this story is significant due to the risk of eroding trust in the justice system and the possible consequences for political stability in Madrid.
González Amador, partner of Madrid’s regional president Isabel Díaz Ayuso, presented his official stance on the case in which he faces charges of two tax crimes and falsifying documents. According to Ale Espanol, the prosecution and state representatives are seeking nearly four years in prison and a fine of €448,927. The defense argues that the charges are unfounded and that the proceedings have been marred by breaches of the right to a fair trial.
Defense arguments
In their statement, González Amador’s lawyers emphasize that the actual circumstances do not match the accusations. According to them, there were neither tax crimes nor document forgery, nor any involvement in a criminal group. The defense refers to the recent conviction of former Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz for disclosing official correspondence related to this case. The lawyers believe this fact has led to a violation of the right to a fair trial.
Lawyer Carlos Neira, representing the interests of González Amador, had previously offered the prosecution a deal to admit to two tax violations. However, after details of the negotiations became public, the defense insists that the process has lost its objectivity. The case materials cite statements by ministers and President Pedro Sánchez, which, according to the defense, shape a negative public perception of the accused.
Financial details
The main point of dispute is that Maxwell Cremona, owned by González Amador, had no corporate income tax debt for 2020 and 2021. The defense argues that all contested invoices reflect real services provided. If the tax authorities had applied their own proposed adjustments, the tax amount would not have exceeded €120,000, meaning there would have been no grounds for a criminal offense.
González Amador has already paid the €300,000 demanded by the tax authorities. This led to a reduction in the prison sentence requested by the prosecution and state lawyers. Despite this, the case continues to spark widespread public debate, with discussions over its details extending far beyond the courtroom.
Political context
Allegations against the partner of the Madrid leader have sparked new political debates. Opposition parties, such as PSOE and Más Madrid, are demanding tougher measures and accuse the authorities of trying to cover up the scandal. Meanwhile, Ayuso’s supporters believe the case is being used to put pressure on the regional government.
The surge of interest in this story coincided with other high-profile events involving the Madrid leadership. For example, the previous awarding of a prize to Donald Trump provoked a strong response in Spanish and international society, as detailed in the coverage about how Ayuso’s decision to honor Trump triggered a wave of criticism.
Reference context
In recent years, Spain has faced a series of high-profile cases involving allegations of tax crimes among prominent figures. Such proceedings are often accompanied by active media discussions and sharp statements from politicians. In 2024, several entrepreneurs and public personalities found themselves in the spotlight due to suspicions of tax evasion, leading to tighter controls by tax authorities. These cases highlight the importance of transparency and impartiality within the judicial system, as well as the need to protect the rights of all parties involved.
