The deadline is 15:00 this Thursday. Spain's Fiscalía, Abogacía del Estado, Iustitia Europa and Vox must respond to the Supreme Court's suspension of registrations in the Censo Electoral de Residentes Ausentes en el Extranjero, known as CERA. The order could affect Spaniards who gained nationality under the 'ley de nietos' before the general election on 29 November.
The court is expected to decide next week whether the suspension should remain in place. The proceedings also involve the Ministry of Justice, the Junta Electoral Central and the Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
The election date changed the stakes. In two orders, the Administrative Litigation Chamber opened a new round of submissions before ruling on the Government's appeal for reconsideration. The appeal challenges the precautionary suspension imposed by the Supreme Court between 8 and 10 September, information from the court proceedings, as the wider case continues.
The court initially justified the measure by citing electoral transparency and rising registrations. It said the general interests of the State took precedence over the voting rights of people who had acquired Spanish nationality. The suspension came before the early election was called, and the new timetable has made its practical effect more urgent.
The case concerns people who obtained Spanish nationality under the 'ley de nietos', whether or not they have already entered the electoral register. The court said it needed to hear their position before deciding whether the legal relationship in the proceedings had been properly and effectively established. It did not explain how that consultation should take place.
The People's Party has separately asked the Junta Electoral Central for guarantees that people whose CERA registrations were suspended will not vote on 29 November. That request has brought the dispute into the election's immediate administration.
The Abogacía del Estado says the suspension goes too far. In its view, the measure restricts the voting rights of Spanish nationals whose nationality was acquired without the court identifying any illegality.
It also warned that reviewing approximately 170,000 files involving new voters before the ordinary census deadline of 1 January would be materially impossible. The State Attorney's position treats the measure as a restriction on citizens whose nationality is already recognized, not as a challenge to the validity of their nationality.
The early election creates a separate problem: the relevant register is dated 1 August, before the court's September suspension. People affected by the measure may already appear on that list.
Iustitia Europa has asked the court to state how the suspension should apply to the 29 November election. Vox has asked for the voting rights of all Spaniards who acquired nationality through the 'ley de nietos' to be suspended, including the children and grandchildren of exiles, unless the Junta Electoral Central decides otherwise.
The exception covers people who can prove through a consulate that they descend from exiles persecuted for political, ideological or religious reasons, or because of their sexual orientation. The relevant rule comes from the 2022 Law of Democratic Memory.
The dispute now extends beyond the register itself. The court's temporary measure must be applied to an election calendar that has already moved forward. The affected voters hold Spanish nationality, and the court has not declared that nationality invalid.
An earlier legal report in another electoral context showed that the practical challenge often lies in carrying out a judicial decision. El País and other Spanish media have reported that a full ruling on the underlying appeals is unlikely to arrive before 29 November. The immediate question is how the temporary measure will work in the election.
The Supreme Court must now address three connected points: whether to lift the suspension, how it applies to the 1 August register and how the affected citizens can be heard.
The next ruling will shape the 29 November vote. The 48-hour order has made the case an immediate election issue, with CERA registrations no longer a routine census matter.
