The hearings on the DANA tragedy in the Congress of Deputies became one of the most talked-about events of the week. Spanish society once again faced the question: how do politicians respond to disasters that have claimed hundreds of lives? This time, attention was focused not only on the substance of the discussion but also on the manner in which it was conducted.
At the center of the events was Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the leader of one of the country’s largest political forces. His speech was marked by tense clashes with representatives of other parties, instantly sparking a wave of emotion in the chamber. Deputies from ERC and Bildu were especially vocal, further intensifying the overall tension.
Journalists’ reaction
Journalists who followed the hearings did not remain on the sidelines. One of the most striking comments was made live on national television. The host of a program on TVE, observing the events, expressed his opinion in just two words that instantly spread across social media. His assessment sounded like an accusation: the discussion had turned into a spectacle where the victims were mentioned the least.
The host noted that instead of analyzing the causes and consequences of the tragedy, the participants of the hearing became consumed by mutual accusations and political infighting. According to him, the discussion was filled with talk about everything except for its core purpose—honoring the memory of the victims and searching for solutions to prevent similar catastrophes in the future.
Political clashes
Particular attention was drawn to the verbal duels between Feijóo and opposition representatives. During the hearings, not only issues related to DANA were discussed, but also topics far removed from the tragedy. At one point, the conversation even touched on the terrorist organization ETA, which puzzled some attendees. Some observers saw this as an attempt to divert the discussion and avoid addressing the real issues.
Experts noted that this tactic is often used to strengthen political positions, but this time it had the opposite effect. Instead of boosting their image, those taking part in the hearings faced criticism for showing a lack of respect for the memory of the victims and their families.
Public reaction
The public response was swift. Dozens of comments appeared on social networks and in leading media outlets, condemning the politicians’ behavior. Many users expressed disappointment that the discussion about the tragedy turned into a platform for political battles rather than a search for solutions and support for those affected.
Some experts believe that such incidents undermine trust in public institutions and deepen citizens’ frustration with the political system. At the same time, these events give rise to a public debate on how hearings concerning the lives and destinies of people should be conducted.
Context and aftermath
The DANA hearings brought back memories of the tragedy that occurred on October 28, 2024, which claimed 230 lives. The country was then shocked by the scale of the disaster and the speed with which the elements wiped out entire neighborhoods. Questions about how such devastating consequences could have been prevented remain unanswered to this day.
In recent years, Spain has repeatedly faced natural disasters that have sparked intense political debate. After each such event, a wave of discussion arises in society about the need for reforms and greater accountability from the authorities. However, as the latest hearings have shown, political disagreements often hinder constructive dialogue and the search for real solutions.
Recalling recent disasters, many note that the response from authorities and politicians is rarely unified. In 2023, a similar situation unfolded following the flood in Andalucía, when parliamentary debates were also marked by mutual accusations and a failure to address the core issue. Such examples only reinforce the feeling that true change requires not only political will, but also respect for the memory of the victims.
