News

Tesla Escapes US Probe but Faces New Door Safety Rules

Tesla Escapes US Probe but Faces New Door Safety Rules RUSSPAIN.com © russpain.com
Tesla Escapes US Probe but Faces New Door Safety Rules © russpain.com
US regulators have declined to investigate Tesla Model 3’s manual door releases after a single complaint, but a new federal rule on emergency exits is in the works. Millions of existing vehicles may remain unaffected.

The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has decided against a formal investigation into the Tesla Model 3’s mechanical door releases, despite a petition raising concerns about emergency egress. Filed by Model 3 owner Kevin Clouse, the request claimed the car’s manual door releases were neither easily accessible nor clearly marked, potentially violating Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 206 (FMVSS 206).

The petition specifically covered 179,031 Model 3 vehicles from the 2022 model year. NHTSA found only one complaint matching the issue, and it came from Clouse himself. The agency said FMVSS 206 governs door locks and door-retention components, including their performance in a crash, but does not cover the labeling or placement of manual release mechanisms. That distinction matters: rules designed to keep doors latched during a collision do not necessarily specify how occupants find or operate an emergency release. NHTSA so concluded that current rules provided no enforceable basis for action.

In the reported incident, Clouse described a frontal collision in which the Model 3 lost power, disabling the electronic door system. NHTSA noted that the 2022 Model 3 owner’s manual includes a section titled In case of emergency, with illustrations showing where to find the manual release. Tesla’s design pairs powered door operation with mechanical emergency releases. The setup can differ between front and rear doors, while child-safety locks raise a separate issue from a loss of vehicle power. Finding no evidence of a broader safety defect, the agency decided a defect investigation was not warranted and that regulatory changes would be a better way to address the issue.

Regulatory Shift Ahead

Tesla has avoided a recall or investigation for now, but the debate over door safety is far from settled. Just days before Clouse’s petition, another request went to NHTSA’s rulemaking office, urging a federal standard requiring “a strong and obvious door opening system in all motor vehicles.” NHTSA has accepted the proposal and is formally developing new rules for emergency door systems. This process is separate from an individual defect petition: it concerns requirements that could apply across the industry, not whether a particular vehicle or component warrants investigation or corrective action.

The agency said a hidden or hard-to-find door release could keep occupants from escaping emergencies such as crashes or fires. Tesla owners have raised similar concerns, including parents who said their children became trapped in the Model Y’s rear seats when the 12-volt system failed. NHTSA has also examined concerns about electronic actuation and power loss in emergency egress, including reports of fatal accidents in which occupants could not exit a vehicle. Assessments depend on details specific to each case, such as the model year and door position, as well as battery condition or crash damage. Reports involving a Model Y, by themselves, do not establish a defect in the 2022 Model 3.

Congress has also weighed in, introducing the SAFE Exit Act in January and citing 15 deaths linked to inaccessible door handles. Tesla also faces lawsuits over fatal accidents involving its door mechanisms, even as it rolls out mechanical solutions in China. The company’s approach to safety and transparency has drawn scrutiny before. Industry observers, for example, questioned Elon Musk’s promises about open-sourcing Tesla’s vehicle code.

NHTSA’s latest decision leaves Tesla in a mixed position: the company avoids a costly recall, while the agency’s move to update federal standards signals that future vehicles from all manufacturers will face stricter emergency-exit requirements. For now, but, millions of Teslas already on the road will not be subject to mandatory retrofits.

Industry analysts say regulatory changes often take years to implement, giving automakers time to adapt their designs. The decision draws attention to the gap between existing door-retention requirements and rising expectations for clear, accessible emergency egress. Regulators are now moving to address it.

Frank Miller RUSSPAIN.com
Editor

Frank Miller

Frank Miller covers the automotive industry, transport and Spanish road regulation for RUSSPAIN.COM