Spain’s Constitutional Court has rejected Extremadura’s bid to overturn the amnesty law, closing all constitutional challenges to the measure. Attention now shifts to unresolved appeals from Catalan independence leaders.
Spain’s Supreme Court has overturned the conviction of a man for mocking tweets about Julen, the child who died in a Málaga well. The ruling highlights the limits of criminal law in cases involving offensive speech.
Spain's top judicial body is divided over complaints against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. The CGPJ has delayed a decision on possible disciplinary action amid protests from police and government officials.
The defense of Eugenio Pino, former police chief, directly challenges Ignacio Cosidó in the Kitchen case trial. Accusations of political distancing and internal conflict intensify as the proceedings near their conclusion.
The Supreme Court has rejected Isabel Pardo de Vera’s request to annul the verdict against José Luis Ábalos. The former Adif president argued that the ruling implied her guilt, even though she was not tried in the case.
Jorge Fernández Díaz, Spain’s former Interior Minister, denies involvement in the Kitchen operation. His defense argues that the accusations are based solely on his ministerial role. The trial is nearing its conclusion amid sharp disputes over the evidence.
The Superior Court of Valencia has confirmed a 28-year prison sentence for a young man convicted of murdering a retired canon. The court rejected all the defense’s arguments, including claims of procedural violations. The ruling is not yet final.
Spain’s public prosecutor has called for the amnesty law to be applied in the Tribunal de Cuentas case on Catalan funds. The move follows a European court decision and could affect high-profile leaders. The Constitutional Court will review related appeals in September.
A Madrid court has confirmed that Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s prime minister, will be tried by a jury. The decision revives a decades-old debate over the role and limits of citizen juries in complex cases.
Public confidence in Spain’s judiciary is at risk as political disputes spill into the courts. Recent surveys show that more than 60% of Spaniards believe justice is influenced by politics. Senior judges and legal experts warn of serious consequences.
Spain is set to fully apply the amnesty law following the EU court's approval. Political deals and judicial resistance have fueled deep institutional conflict, and the outcome will shape the legacy of the 'procés' era.
The Madrid High Court has confirmed a two-year prison term for Toño Sanchís, who was found guilty of misappropriating more than €475,000 from TV personality Belén Esteban. The ruling also includes a fine and a compensation order.
The Madrid Provincial Court has upheld a jury trial for Begoña Gómez on charges of influence peddling and embezzlement, while dismissing business corruption charges. The case has been marked by judicial tensions and repeated legal challenges.
The Supreme Court has applied amnesty to the malversación convictions of four Catalan leaders, clearing their remaining criminal consequences. The ruling follows a Constitutional Court decision rejecting the Supreme Court’s earlier interpretation. Separate procedural steps still affect Carles Puigdemont and two former officials.
The Madrid Provincial Court has narrowed the jury trial against Begoña Gómez to two charges: influence peddling and embezzlement. It has lifted restrictions on her travel. The case continues to draw national attention.
Spain’s amnesty law has won support from the EU’s top court. The government says the measure is constitutional and complies with European law. The ruling addresses tensions over Catalonia’s independence process.
The EU Court of Justice has ruled that Spain’s amnesty law does not breach European rules. The decision covers financial and terrorism-related cases and affects high-profile proceedings in Spain.
The EU’s top court has ruled that Spain’s amnesty law can apply to 12 CDR members facing terrorism charges. The decision clarifies the limits of amnesty under EU law and may affect ongoing high-profile cases.
The EU Court of Justice has ruled that Spain's amnesty law does not breach European rules. The decision could affect cases against Catalan leaders and influence future Supreme Court actions.
The EU Court has ruled on Spain’s amnesty law for malversation and terrorism. Puigdemont remains in Waterloo as its implications unfold. The decision could reshape Spain’s legal and political field.
The Badajoz court has clarified that nepotism and absenteeism, while ethically questionable, do not always constitute crimes. David Sánchez, brother of the Prime Minister, and Luis Carrero were sentenced to nine years’ disqualification from public office for administrative misconduct.
The EU Court in Luxembourg has issued a basic ruling on Spain’s amnesty law. The decision could affect cases tied to Catalan independence and clarify whether the law violates EU rules on terrorism or financial interests.
Begoña Gómez has submitted her London flight tickets to the court. The judge requested evidence about her trip for her daughter's graduation. Her defense argues that prosecutors bear the burden of proof.
Carlos Lesmes, the Supreme Court’s former head, says judges continue to face political pressure. He defends judicial independence as tensions grow over cases involving government figures. Recent court rulings have sharpened the debate.
The EU Court in Luxembourg has ruled on basic aspects of Spain’s amnesty law. At least 57 former officials and activists remain in legal limbo, and the decision could shape the path for Carles Puigdemont’s return.
The Badajoz court ruled that officials created a job for David Sánchez but found no evidence of outside pressure or influence. The verdict leaves basic questions unanswered about who initiated the controversial hiring.
The Provincial Court of Badajoz has sentenced David Sánchez Pérez-Castejón to nine years of disqualification from public office and Miguel Ángel Gallardo to 18 years. The case centers on alleged irregularities in a 2017 public-sector appointment.
Spain's Anticorruption Prosecutor and the State Legal Service reject Zapatero's bid to remove the PP-led prosecution from the Plus Ultra jewels case. The dispute centers on the legitimacy of popular action in a high-profile fiscal probe.
Supreme Court magistrate Manuel Marchena has called public distrust of judges a tragedy. He urged limits on political parties acting as popular prosecutors, warning that politicisation is rising and confidence in Spain's justice system is falling.
Madrid’s Provincial Court is set to rule on whether Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s prime minister, will face a jury trial over alleged corruption and influence peddling. The decision could shape the legal process for all the accused.
The EU's top court has ruled that EU law does not automatically bar Spain's amnesty law. The decision could affect more than 300 people, including Carles Puigdemont, while the Supreme Court's position remains under scrutiny.
The longstanding custody order between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie ends on July 12, as their twins reach adulthood, closing a major legal chapter. The family’s future dynamics and ongoing disputes remain unresolved.
The Supreme Court is set for major changes as several top seats become vacant. Political divisions in the CGPJ have stalled appointments, with high-profile candidates and renewed battles for leadership roles.
Spain’s National Court has instructed police to search Villarejo’s seized files for conversations with María Dolores de Cospedal. The order follows renewed pressure to revisit her alleged ties to the Kitchen case.
Almudena Lastra has taken legal action after not being renewed as Madrid’s chief prosecutor. The Supreme Court will now review the appointment of Isabel Martín. The case highlights ongoing divisions within Spain’s prosecution service.
